Where WebAsk is strong
- One of the longest CRM integration lists in its segment
- A capable AI assistant inside the survey editor
- A mature support team and stable infrastructure
- A large library of survey templates
Home
Askyo vs WebAsk
WebAsk is a solid mid-market survey tool with a long integration list. Here is where it is strong, and where Askyo is structurally different.
In short
WebAsk competes in the mid price segment: 40+ question types, an AI assistant and a long list of CRM integrations. Its weak points are the iframe widget (180+ KB), the absence of a visual logic editor and branding on the free plan.
Where Askyo is ahead
- A Figma-style graph logic editor – WebAsk uses ordinary list-based skip logic
- A 35 KB Shadow DOM widget against a 180+ KB iframe – it will not break your site design
- A self-hosted build is available; WebAsk has no on-premise option
- Plain JSON export of the survey – take it wherever you like
- A free plan that includes the graph editor and does not restrict question types
- Pro costs less (1 490 ₽ against 1 530–1 990 ₽)
Detailed comparison
| Feature | Askyo | WebAsk |
|---|---|---|
| Visual graph logic editor | ||
| Website widget (size) | ~35 KB Shadow DOM | iframe ~180 KB |
| Self-hosted build | ||
| JSON export of the survey | ||
| Question types | 43 | 40+ |
| AI survey generation | Pro and up | Pro and up |
| Branding on the free plan | no | yes |
| Pro plan | 1 490 ₽/mo | 1 530–1 990 ₽/mo |
| Free plan | 5 surveys / 150 responses | 3 surveys / 100 responses |
| Webhooks + API | on every plan | Pro and up |
| Four runner modes | list / step / paged / chat | list |
The verdict
If your marketing team is built around CRM integrations and your surveys do not need complex branching, WebAsk does the job. If visual logic, a light website widget and a self-hosted option without vendor lock-in matter, Askyo is the better fit.
Ready to try Askyo instead of WebAsk?
Start on the free plan; migration on request. We will move your existing surveys by hand if you need it.